PHOTO: How many open-home visitors are actually qualified buyers
Open homes have been part of New Zealand real estate for generations. But in an age of virtual tours, property portals, digital buyer databases and instant access to property information, it’s worth asking an uncomfortable question: who benefits most from an open home — the vendor or the agent?
Saturday AND/OR Sunday morning.
The beds are made. The kitchen bench is spotless. The dog has been removed. The kids have been warned not to touch anything. The lawns were mowed yesterday and anything remotely embarrassing has been shoved into a cupboard.
Then the homeowners leave.
For the next 30 to 45 minutes, complete strangers are invited to wander through their biggest financial asset.
They inspect the bedrooms.
Open wardrobes.
Look at the family photos.
Examine the backyard.
Peer into the garage.
Discuss what they don’t like about the kitchen.
And occasionally ask the agent questions loud enough for everyone else to hear.
Welcome to the great New Zealand open home.
It’s such an established part of selling residential property that we barely question it.
Perhaps we should.
Because while an open home can absolutely help sell a property, it can also provide something incredibly valuable to the person standing at the front door with the clipboard:
Leads.
And lots of them.
NZ Real Estate’s $20,000 Question: Are Agents Still Worth the Commission?
You thought they were there to sell YOUR house
Fundamentally, that’s exactly what an open home should be about.
The vendor has engaged an agent to obtain the best possible result from their property.
Open homes can be extremely effective.
They make inspecting convenient. They reduce the need to arrange numerous private appointments. They can generate excitement and, critically, they can put competing buyers in the same property at the same time.
Nothing tells a hesitant buyer that they may need to make a decision quite like seeing another couple walking through the house for the second time.
That’s real.
But something else is happening simultaneously.
Every person who walks through that door is potentially entering the agent’s sales ecosystem.
Name.
Phone number.
Email address.
Buying intentions.
Price range.
Current property ownership.
Whether they need to sell before buying.
Suddenly an open home isn’t simply a property inspection.
It can also be a lead-generation event.
And that’s where things get interesting.
The person who doesn’t buy your house could still be incredibly valuable
Imagine 20 groups inspect a property.
One eventually buys it.
What happens to the other 19?
From the vendor’s perspective, they didn’t buy the property.
From an effective real estate agent’s perspective, however, some could be extremely valuable.
One might want another property in the neighbourhood.
Another may have a house to sell.
Another might be six months away from buying.
Another could be an investor.
Someone else may ask the agent for an appraisal.
The agent has just met a room full of potential future clients.
And importantly, the vendor’s property attracted them.
That’s not necessarily sinister.
Prospecting is part of real estate.
Good agents build databases, maintain relationships and connect buyers with properties.
In fact, a powerful database is one of the things vendors are supposedly paying an experienced agent for.
But it raises a question rarely discussed at the kitchen table during a listing presentation:
How much value does your listing create for your agent beyond the sale of your house?
Potentially quite a lot.
The neighbour everyone laughs about may be the most valuable visitor
Agents know the stereotype.
The nosy neighbour.
They arrive five minutes after the open home begins.
They aren’t buying.
They know exactly what the owners paid.
They know the previous owners.
They know who built the fence.
And they’ll probably tell the agent that the house down the road has a better kitchen.
Everyone laughs about them.
But here’s the thing.
That neighbour owns a house.
And perhaps they’re considering selling it.
If the agent impresses them, today’s “nosy neighbour” could become next month’s $900,000 listing.
From the agent’s business perspective, that’s potentially an extremely valuable open-home visitor.
From the vendor’s perspective?
They just walked through your bedroom.
How many open-home visitors are actually qualified buyers?
This is another question sellers should ask.
If 30 groups attended your open home, that sounds fantastic.
But what does 30 groups actually mean?
How many had finance arranged?
How many could genuinely afford the property?
How many were looking in the area?
How many owned another property they needed to sell first?
How many were neighbours?
How many were simply curious?
And how many became serious prospective purchasers?
There’s an enormous difference between:
“We had 32 groups through!”
and:
“We identified four qualified buyers who are seriously considering making an offer.”
One is activity.
The other is potential.
Vendors should understand the difference.
Have we confused foot traffic with buyer competition?
Real estate loves numbers.
Views.
Watchlists.
Enquiries.
Open-home attendance.
Database contacts.
Social-media reach.
But none of those numbers buy a house.
A buyer does.
An open home with 40 groups and no serious buyer is not necessarily more successful than a private inspection with two qualified purchasers who both make offers.
This isn’t an argument against open homes.
It’s an argument for measuring the thing that actually matters:
buyer intent.
And then there’s privacy
This part of the traditional open-home model deserves more discussion.
A house isn’t a retail store.
It’s someone’s home.
There can be family photographs on walls.
Children’s bedrooms.
Work equipment.
Medication.
Electronics.
Personal documents.
Vehicles.
Security systems.
Valuable possessions.
And dozens of small details that reveal information about the people living there.
Responsible agents take security seriously, and vendors are commonly advised to remove or secure valuables, medications and personal information before inspections.
But the basic proposition remains extraordinary when you think about it:
We’re inviting people we don’t know into a private home because they might be interested in buying it.
Twenty years ago, there weren’t many alternatives.
Today there are.
Technology has changed the first inspection
A serious buyer can now know an enormous amount about a property before setting foot inside.
They can often see:
Professional photography.
Video.
Drone imagery.
Floor plans.
Satellite views.
Street views.
Previous sales history.
Estimated values.
School zones.
Council information.
Neighbourhood sales.
Walking distances.
Nearby amenities.
And sometimes sophisticated 3D virtual tours.
A buyer can effectively eliminate dozens of properties without physically visiting them.
That’s efficient for everyone.
So perhaps the first stage of the modern property inspection shouldn’t automatically be:
“Everyone come through Sunday at 1pm.”
Perhaps it should increasingly be:
“Here is everything you need to determine whether this property genuinely suits you. If it does, let’s arrange an inspection.”
Would fewer, better-qualified inspections actually benefit vendors?
Imagine an alternative model.
Before viewing a property, prospective purchasers receive comprehensive digital information.
They confirm they’re genuinely looking within the property’s approximate price range.
They book an inspection.
The agent knows who’s coming.
The buyer receives more personalised attention.
The seller has fewer strangers wandering through their house.
Would that necessarily produce a worse result?
Not always.
For some properties, particularly unusual, high-value or privacy-sensitive homes, it could arguably be better.
But there’s a catch.
It removes one of the great psychological advantages of the open home.
Buyers seeing other buyers can be incredibly powerful
This is where open homes earn their place.
Competition matters.
Imagine you’re inspecting a property privately.
You walk around quietly.
You like it.
You leave.
Maybe you’ll think about it.
Now imagine you’re inspecting the same property while three other couples are doing exactly the same thing.
One asks for the LIM.
Another is measuring the living room.
Someone outside is asking the agent about the deadline sale.
Suddenly the property doesn’t feel quite so available.
Other people want it.
That’s powerful.
A well-attended open home can create urgency that no virtual tour can replicate.
That’s why writing off open homes entirely would be foolish.
The question isn’t whether open homes work.
They clearly can.
The question is whether they should remain the automatic default for almost every property.
Here’s the uncomfortable question for agents
Suppose an agent holds eight open homes for your property.
During those open homes they meet 100 prospective buyers and homeowners.
Your property eventually sells.
Great.
But six months later, those contacts have also helped the agent secure three additional listings and several buyers.
Again, there’s nothing inherently wrong with that.
That’s smart business.
But it demonstrates something important:
Your listing wasn’t only an asset to you. It was an asset to your agent’s business.
That makes the relationship more interesting than the traditional vendor-service-provider model suggests.
The vendor provides the product.
The vendor may pay for the marketing.
The property generates the attention.
The agent captures the enquiries.
And many of those relationships remain with the agent long after the SOLD sticker goes up.
In fact, this explains why listings are so valuable to agents
Real estate agents don’t simply compete for sales.
They compete fiercely for listings.
Because listings generate business.
A good listing produces signs on streets.
Advertising online.
Social-media content.
Database communication.
Buyer enquiries.
Open-home traffic.
Neighbour conversations.
Appraisal opportunities.
Future vendors.
And eventually, hopefully, a commission.
One property can become an entire marketing campaign for an agent.
Which makes you wonder whether vendors fully understand the commercial value they’re providing.
What should vendors be asking?
Instead of simply asking:
“How many people came through?”
Try asking:
How many were genuine buyers?
How many indicated serious interest?
How many requested documents?
How many are financially positioned to purchase?
What objections did buyers consistently raise?
Which visitors are likely to return?
Who are you following up with today?
What are you doing differently before the next open home?
And perhaps:
Do we actually need another open home?
Those questions turn the conversation from activity to strategy.
That’s where it should be.
Agents should be able to justify every open home
“We always do open homes on Sunday” isn’t a strategy.
A good agent should be able to explain why an open home makes sense for a particular property.
Perhaps there’s strong buyer demand.
Perhaps the property appeals to a broad market.
Perhaps creating visible competition is important.
Perhaps access is easier when inspections are consolidated.
Great.
Do it.
But if the property has been sitting on the market for eight weeks and the same three neighbours keep turning up, holding another identical open home because that’s simply what happens on Sunday deserves questioning.
At some point, strategy needs to change.
The industry’s best agents already understand this
This isn’t an attack on agents.
Quite the opposite.
Great agents don’t simply unlock doors.
They manage buyers.
They qualify interest.
They follow up relentlessly.
They recognise buying signals.
They create competition.
They adapt campaigns when something isn’t working.
And they understand that 50 people wandering through a property means very little if none of them are capable of buying it.
The agents who should feel uncomfortable about this conversation aren’t the great ones.
They’re the agents whose entire campaign can be summarised as:
List it.
Put it online.
Hold an open home.
Wait.
Maybe the future is hybrid
Open homes probably aren’t disappearing.
Nor should they.
But the future could be more selective.
Use digital marketing to generate interest.
Use video and virtual tours to filter casual browsers.
Qualify serious prospects.
Hold strategic open homes when competition is beneficial.
Offer private appointments where appropriate.
Provide vendors with meaningful reporting about buyer quality rather than just visitor numbers.
And treat access to someone’s home as something that should have a purpose.
That seems like progress.
Your house. Their database.
The traditional open home remains one of the most effective tools in residential real estate.
But let’s stop pretending it benefits only the homeowner.
It doesn’t.
Every successful open home potentially does two things:
It markets the vendor’s property.
And:
It markets the agent.
That’s simply commercial reality.
There’s nothing wrong with an agent building their business while doing a great job for their vendor.
In fact, successful agents should generate future business from excellent work.
But vendors deserve to understand the entire equation.
Because when you’re paying thousands of dollars for marketing and potentially tens of thousands in commission, every part of the campaign should ultimately have one primary objective: getting you the best possible result.
Not filling a database.
Not meeting the neighbours.
Not generating the next listing.
Selling your property.
So next Saturday, when 25 people wander through someone’s bedrooms, kitchen and backyard, perhaps there’s one question worth asking: