PROPERTY NOISE | MARKET ANALYSIS

More first-home buyers are entering New Zealand’s housing market, but that is not translating into a broad recovery. Tony Alexander’s latest survey suggests a market supported by buyers seeking a home, while investors remain scarce and fear of overpaying persists.

PHOTO: New Zealand’s housing market is sending two different messages. FILE

First-home buyer activity is strengthening. Yet agents continue to report falling prices, subdued investor interest and little urgency among purchasers.

That challenges the assumption that more people looking for their first home must signal the beginning of another property boom.

An alternative reading is emerging: first-home buyers are taking advantage of softer conditions without creating the competition needed to lift the wider market.

Independent economist Tony Alexander’s latest NZHL-sponsored survey, discussed in his OneRoof commentary on 7 October, illustrates that divide.

FIRST-HOME BUYERS ARE ACTIVE—BUT THE BOOM INGREDIENTS ARE MISSING

A net 45% of surveyed agents reported seeing more first-home buyers, up from a net 32% a month earlier.

Meanwhile, a net 46% reported seeing fewer investors, compared with a net 49% previously.

Only 8% of agents said buyers were displaying fear of missing out, or FOMO, up slightly from 6%.

Together, those results suggest improving activity from one group rather than a widespread rush into property.

Survey measureLatest readingWhat it measures
More first-home buyersNet 45%Balance of agents reporting an increase versus a decrease
Fewer investorsNet 46%Balance of agents reporting a decrease versus an increase
Falling prices nationallyNet 40%Balance of agents observing falling versus rising prices
Buyers displaying FOMO8%Share of agents reporting fear of missing out
Buyers concerned about further price falls45%Share of agents identifying that concern

These are survey observations—not transaction totals, percentages of buyers or measured changes in house prices.

For example, a net 45% reading does not mean first-home buyer purchases increased by 45%. It describes the balance of agents reporting changes in activity.

A MARKET FOR FINDING A HOME, RATHER THAN CHASING A GAIN?

The contrast between first-home buyers and investors offers a useful way to understand the current market.

Someone buying their first home may be responding to personal circumstances: a growing family, a desire for stability or an opportunity to leave renting.

An investor faces a different calculation involving rental income, expenses, financing and potential returns.

The survey does not establish why every participant is acting. But it supports the interpretation that demand for a place to live is proving more resilient than investor enthusiasm.

That can sustain transactions without producing rapid price growth.

It also means greater first-home buyer participation should not automatically be presented as proof that confidence has returned across the market.

THE NORTH–SOUTH DIVIDE IS ABOUT BREADTH, NOT THE SIZE OF PRICE FALLS

Alexander’s findings show a clear geographic contrast.

A net 47% of North Island agents reported falling prices, compared with a net 10% in the South Island.

The North Island reading therefore indicates that reports of price weakness are more widespread among surveyed agents.

It does not establish that North Island prices fell by 47%, identify the suburb with the largest decline or quantify how much faster prices are falling.

AreaNet agents reporting falling prices
North Island47%
South Island10%
New Zealand overall40%

For buyers and sellers, the implication is that national headlines can conceal different local conditions.

An Auckland vendor, a Wellington buyer and a Christchurch homeowner may be operating in markets with quite different levels of competition.

Property Noise explored those differences in its coverage of NZ house values falling for a sixth consecutive month.

THE SOUTH ISLAND IS MORE RESILIENT—BUT BUYERS ARE STILL CAUTIOUS

The stronger South Island reading should not be mistaken for a buying frenzy.

In both islands, a net 10% of agents reported fewer people attending open homes. South Island FOMO remained low at 7%.

That is an important qualification.

A market can experience less price weakness without becoming overheated. Buyers may continue to compare properties, negotiate and take their time even where values are holding up better.

The survey suggests relative resilience in the South Island, rather than evidence of a broad return to frantic bidding.

FEAR OF OVERPAYING IS A BIGGER SIGNAL THAN FOMO

Perhaps the most revealing result is that 45% of agents identified concern about prices falling after purchase.

Alexander calls this FOOP—fear of overpaying.

That figure and the FOMO reading measure different observations, so they should not be treated as directly comparable proportions of buyers. Nevertheless, they point towards a cautious market mood.

A buyer worried about missing out may accelerate a decision. A buyer worried about paying too much may request more information, reduce an offer or continue searching.

This creates a challenge for sellers: interest in a property does not necessarily mean urgency to buy it.

Property Noise previously examined how increased choice changes negotiating conditions in NZ housing stock hits a 12-year high—buyers now hold the cards.

FINANCE IS ONLY PART OF THE BUYING DECISION

The survey also distinguishes between obtaining finance and feeling comfortable making a major commitment.

27% of agents said buyers were worried about obtaining the finance they needed, compared with 23% a month earlier.

Meanwhile, 38% identified employment concerns, down from the 53% reading Alexander recorded in late March.

The improvement in employment sentiment is encouraging. But concern remains relevant to a decision involving years of repayments.

A household may qualify for a mortgage and still hesitate because it lacks confidence in future income.

That is why easier access to lending, on its own, does not guarantee stronger demand.

AUCKLAND SHOWS WHY ACTIVITY AND RECOVERY MUST BE SEPARATED

Property Noise’s recent report on Barfoot & Thompson’s September sales falling 26% compared with a year earlier provides a local example of subdued conditions.

Those figures relate to one agency’s business, rather than every Auckland transaction. Nevertheless, they reinforce the importance of examining sales activity, stock and prices separately. Property Noise

More first-home buyers looking does not necessarily offset weaker activity from investors or existing owners considering a move.

A recovery needs completed transactions and sustainable buyer demand—not simply a busier conversation about buying.

INTEREST-RATE UNCERTAINTY CAN KEEP BUYERS ON THE SIDELINES

Alexander’s commentary identifies mortgage-rate increases and the possibility of further rises as risks to a sustained recovery.

Forecasts remain uncertain, but the practical issue is straightforward: buyers must assess the repayments they can manage, alongside the price they are willing to pay.

Property Noise examined the outlook in ASB’s forecast of further OCR increases and a delayed return to previous house-price peaks. These are forecasts, rather than guaranteed outcomes. Property Noise

For a first-home buyer, a softer purchase price is helpful. It becomes less helpful if financing costs or income uncertainty undermine the household budget.

WHAT THIS MEANS FOR SELLERS

The survey suggests sellers should prepare for informed, cautious buyers.

A credible asking price needs support from recent comparable transactions. Marketing needs to explain why the property suits its likely purchasers. Follow-up needs to distinguish casual interest from buyers who can proceed.

Relying on a general spring uplift may be insufficient when urgency remains limited.

Before committing to a campaign, sellers can also estimate expenses using Property Noise’s cost-to-sell-a-house calculator.

FIRST-HOME BUYERS CAN SUPPORT THE MARKET WITHOUT RESCUING IT

Alexander’s survey highlights an important distinction: more first-home buyer activity and a stronger overall housing market are not the same thing.

New buyers can find opportunities, complete purchases and improve their housing security while prices remain subdued.

That is a useful outcome for those households. It does not require a new boom.

The question now is whether their activity broadens into stronger demand from other groups—or whether New Zealand remains in a market where buyers participate carefully, investors hesitate and sellers must meet realistic expectations.

Source: Tony Alexander’s OneRoof commentary, published 7 October 2026, discussing his latest NZHL-sponsored real estate agent survey. Additional interpretation by Property Noise.