Chris Hipkins

PHOTO: Chris Hipkins. FILE

Labour’s Capital Gains Tax Plan: A Risky Move Masquerading as a Solution

Why taxing Kiwi dreams won’t fix the housing crisis


🧨 A New Tax — Old Thinking

Labour has unveiled its latest shiny “fix” for New Zealand’s housing affordability: a Capital Gains Tax on property sales.

It’s pitched as the golden key that will unlock housing supply, make prices fairer, and fill government coffers with revenue so abundant it might flow like Waikato River after a rainstorm.

Except… that’s not how reality works.

NZ Business Database | 2025 (VERIFIED MOBILE & EMAIL) – The Ultimate Resource for Connecting with New Zealand Companies


❌ What a Capital Gains Tax Actually Does

Here’s the inconvenient truth:

Promised Benefit What Actually Happens
Improve affordability Landlords increase rents to offset tax
Boost housing supply Investors exit the market, supply shrinks
Make it fairer Everyday Kiwi mums and dads get stung
Target speculators Long-term owners and retirees get caught in the net

A CGT doesn’t create a single home.
It simply takes money from those who provide the homes.


🧩 The Root Problem Isn’t Tax

New Zealand’s housing shortage comes from:

✔ Costly, slow consenting
✔ Land locked behind zoning rules
✔ Construction delays and labour shortages
✔ Infrastructure that can’t keep up
✔ Decades of underbuilding

Taxing the symptom doesn’t heal the cause.

It’s like treating a broken leg with a parking ticket.


💸 Higher Rents Incoming

Landlords are not mythical ATM machines lurking in Remuera. They’re:

• Teachers investing for retirement
• Tradies building wealth beyond wages
• Families renting out an old home to buy a new one

When costs rise, rents follow.

And renters are already paying top dollar in:

• Auckland
• Wellington
• Tauranga
• Queenstown

Adding CGT is like throwing petrol on an already expensive barbecue.


🧓 Retirees Hit the Hardest

Many Kiwis rely on investment property as their retirement plan.

Capital Gains Tax means:

• Less equity
• Delayed retirement
• Reduced intergenerational wealth transfer

A policy pitched as fairness ends up punishing responsibility.


🏗️ Developers Will Slow Down

Developers fund new homes by selling the last ones.

Tax their gains and:

• Feasibility drops
• Fewer projects proceed
• New supply evaporates

Imagine telling builders:
“Please fix the housing crisis… but we’ll fine you if you succeed.”


🌍 International Lessons: Results May Vary… but Mostly Fail

Countries with CGT still suffer:

• Housing unaffordability
• Supply shortages
• Investor exodus

Examples include Australia, UK, Canada.
Spoiler alert: it didn’t fix anything there either.


🥁 What Would Actually Help?

Instead of taxing ambition:

🏘️ Fast-track consents
🛣️ Invest in infrastructure
📉 Reduce compliance drag
🏗️ Incentivise new builds not punish them
🚫 Cut red tape strangling development

Build more homes.
Don’t tax the ones we already have.


🔮 Outlook: Policy Misfire Incoming

Labour’s CGT proposal is being sold as a fairness revolution. In reality, it risks:

• Higher rents
• Lower supply
• Weaker retirement security
• Slower economic growth

The real winners?
Bureaucracy and paperwork.

The losers?
Everyday New Zealanders.


🎯 The Takeaway

A Capital Gains Tax sounds like a bold idea.
But bold doesn’t equal smart.

New Zealand doesn’t need another tax.
It needs a construction boom.

Homes, not hurdles.

Don't be shy! Have your say....